Nov 062012
 

This week on UnderDiscussion we’re joined by both Lance and Kat to discuss fantasy fiction. We mention the awesome site Goodreads, admit that we’re totally the proof of belasaro’s maxim, what we are reading, what he have read, what makes a fantasy novel (and what we think makes a good fantasy novel) and we finish up with our assigned reading list.

The Undergopher Summer Reading List

This episode clocks in at about 49 minutes.

Dec 022011
 

This week I only have one thing that can justify this post’s inclusion in my RPG feed, but it’s enough. Also, we continue the brief reviews of all the Harry potter books and I reveal I’m an uncultured swine with my Animal Farm “review”. Let’s get started, shall we?

==

The Astromundi Cluster (Spelljammer Game Accessory 1087)The Astromundi Cluster by Sam Witt

My rating: 1 of 5 stars

I don’t generally buy campaign setting books, but since this was part of the SpellJammer line I had to pick it up. My single biggest problem with the Astromundi cluster was that it was too contained, that it allowed no real chance to escape into the wider galaxy of spelljamming. I know that there are a lot of people who hated the crossover setting approach that Spelljammer took, I personally hated having to deal with the Dragonlance steel for gold exchange scheme that by players came up with, but there was no reason to trap players in a single sphere for an entire campaign.

==

I own every single SpellJammer product that was not an article in Dragon Magazine, and this is my least favorite. There is really nothing in this setting that I could mine for my home brew SpellJammer spheres.

==

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (Harry Potter, #3)Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban by J.K. Rowling

My rating: 4 of 5 stars

In my opinion this is the best of the Harry Potter series. They introduce a great character who might actually care enough about Harry to help him in his epic struggle against an evil wizard who couldn’t kill a baby in a crib (Memo to voldemort: just use a knife). The dementors thing was cool, but the deus ex time travel thing was easily the worst part of it, and really introduces the the biggest plot hole the series has.

==

Some people may disagree, but I think it was all down hill from here.

==

Angel: After the Fall, Volume 1Angel: After the Fall, Volume 1 by Joss Whedon

My rating: 3 of 5 stars

As a fan of the Angel (how I became a fan is a funny story) I felt that this was a good start to a comic adaptation of the series as well as a good start at resolving the cliffhanger ending that Joss and Co left us with. I think the way it jumps into the action a while after the end of the show and with LA plunged into the heart of hell was the best way to deliver a great story and I would recommend the comics to any Angel or Buffy fan.

==

Great followup to a great series.

==

Animal FarmAnimal Farm by George Orwell

My rating: 1 of 5 stars

I have to admit, I read this only because it was required reading in High School. I’m not a fan of political satire, and while I understand why this book was assigned I’m still not a big fan.

==

Remember, these review posts are just sort of a “light snack” to start off your day. You don’t have to tell me how wrong I am about my opinions in the comments section of this post. I would hate it if some big internet personality, like say Wil Wheaton, were to point his followers at this page to show me how wrong I am in my views or how badly I spell.

That would just be awful.

Nov 252011
 

This week’s post is full of imagination and excitement. Oh, and the Iliad.

==
Descent into the Depths of the Earth (Greyhawk Classics, #3)Descent into the Depths of the Earth by Paul Kidd

My rating: 4 of 5 stars

The second in what I refer to as “the Justicar series” is just as much fun as the first book. It was amazing to me that licensed books based on old D&D adventures could be this fun to read. Paul Kidd does a great job with the main characters. There’s action and adventure, mystery, humor, and clever thinking to get around a few of the puzzles that the module the book is based on is known for. I would say that it feels like a group of players playing through a campaign, but these characters are written better and there aren’t any Monty Python jokes being tossed around.

==

I honestly wish that Paul Kidd would write more addaptations of classic adventures. These are great and I’d love to see him continue with the cast of characters he’s created for them.

==

Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (Harry Potter, #2)Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets by J.K. Rowling

My rating: 3 of 5 stars

I’m not sure I can give this book a fair review, coming back to review it after reading the rest of the series. It’s another year at Hogwarts, and this time the awful school secret that tries to kill Harry and Co. is a big snake. An average book for the series, which is still saying something positive.

Again the characters are mostly well written, I felt it was sort of an ass-pull to have a big chamber of snake dwelling evil hidden in a freakin’ school, but I didn’t attend school in England, so for all I know it’s nothing out of the ordinary. We get more quiddich, which is like wizard soccer and just as interesting (take that as you will).

==

I’m just joking about the quiddich being like soccer. Mostly because I can imagine reasons why people like to watch soccer. Quiddich is a horrible game and I hate the fact that so much of the book series was dedicated to it. We get it, Harry is super good at the one part of the sport that makes everyone else useless, move the hell on!

==

Just Imagine Stan Lee Creating the DC Universe - Book 1Just Imagine Stan Lee Creating the DC Universe – Book 1 by Stan Lee

My rating: 3 of 5 stars

(This is my review for both volumes)

I’ve always been a fan of the Marvel “What If” and DC “Elseworlds” series of books, so it was interesting to see what Stan “The Man” Lee would have done with the DC universe. He was given a chance to reimagine the classic lineup of DC heroes, and the result was the miniseries collected in these two volumes. In some cases (Batman, Wonder Woman, The Flash) I preferred the characters to their regular versions, but in most of the others I think they were a little too “classic Stan Lee” to really be successful. I would have loved to have seen a few of these characters get miniseries of their own.
==

With the reboot that just occurred at DC I’m sort of sad that they didn’t go with a few of the concepts that Stan The Man came up with for the characters.

==

The IliadThe Iliad by Homer

My rating: 1 of 5 stars

Even remembering this book makes me want to take a nap. It’s a long, drawn out combat between two forces and ends with the only memorable scene (the trojan horse) in the entire thing. I recommend that you skip right to the Odyssey.

==

I have nothing more to say about this book.

Nov 182011
 

This week’s short reviews are a classic campaign setting and three classic novels.

==

Forgotten Realms Campaign Setting (Forgotten Realms) (Dungeons & Dragons 3rd Edition)Forgotten Realms Campaign Setting (Forgotten Realms) by Ed Greenwood

My rating: 1 of 5 stars

I have to admit that the Forgotten Realms is my least favorite campaign setting only because I don’t have an opinion about Greyhawk. Now, my experience may be colored by the people who I gamed with at the time I was playing in the Realms, but I did not enjoy the excruciating level of detail that the setting has accumulated over the years. My first foray into Dungeons and Dragons was Game Mastering, and I hadn’t yet developed the GM chops to shut down the irritating players in my group. Having to deal with the one Canon Lawyer picking apart every single plot and description made the game nothing but a chore.

I think the biggest issue that the later era Realms setting has going against it was that TSR decided that all novels became canon to the setting. It filled the setting with all powerful demi-gods that rendered most adventurers moot and filled in way too much of the map.
==

Are my perceptions tainted by the jerkbag I used to play with? Yes, but I’m laying half of the blame on the “everything’s canon” policy for making me have to deal with it.

==

Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone (Harry Potter, #1)Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone by J.K. Rowling

My rating: 4 of 5 stars

This was the beginning of what could be considered a fantasy renaissance. Sorcerer’s Stone (sorry, I’m an American, we didn’t get the proper title on this side of the pond) was the first in a seven book series that, along with the Lord of the Rings movies, made fantasy popular again, and for that alone it’s deserving of four stars.

I love the cast of characters and I personally thing that Rowling does a good job of bringing the setting alive.
==

I’m not going to hear any arguments, Harry Potter is one of the new classics and will be read and talked about in centuries to come the same way that the next two books are read and talked about today.

==

Pride and PrejudicePride and Prejudice by Jane Austen

My rating: 4 of 5 stars

I read this as part of my “read the classics” project and was fully expecting to hate it. I was pleasantly surprised to discover that the dry humor throughout made it a pleasant read.

==

I don’t think I’m stating clearly enough in my review how much I was surprised I liked the book. I was dreading reading this. I had just finished reading Dracula (which I hated) and wasn’t looking forward to another Victorian snoozer. Imagine my reaction when I finish the damn thing in a day and a half. It wasn’t anything like the books that I usually read (I’m a fan of genre books, not literary stuff like this). I enjoyed it enough that I’m actually not looking forward to Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, because I don’t want to see it “ruined forever” in my mind.

==

The OdysseyThe Odyssey by Homer

My rating: 5 of 5 stars

Read this as part of my “read the classics” project for justifying an e-reader. It’s a little slow at times but is the grandfather of the fantasy adventure, so it can be forgiven for a few pacing issues.

==

I’m going to say that this is so much more readable than the Iliad it’s not even funny.

Nov 112011
 

This week I brave the mind twisting horrors of Xoriat, the evil machinations of the Space Witch, the boring schemes of demons, and the sinister plans of an evil book club.

==

The Orb of Xoriat (Eberron: War-Torn, #2)The Orb of Xoriat by Edward Bolme

My rating: 4 of 5 stars

This was a fantastic book! It fast paced without feeling rushed and the author did a great job with the fight scenes, vivid descriptions without being unnecessarily gory. I liked the main character, he was a little flat at first but the author developed him well. The book does a good job of explaining only as much as the reader would need without getting bogged down in setting details, but there is alot here for an Eberron fan to make this feel like it couldn’t have taken place in another setting. It was a fun action/adventure and I would gladly recommend it.
==

This was the second of the Eberron novels that I read,  and it follows up on a short story from Tales of the Last War (The first Eberron novel I read.) It follows Teron, a monk trained for war and little else, trying to prevent the disaster to come if the title relic were to fall into wrong hands while also trying to find his place in a post Last War world. I think it was one of the better book I’ve read this year and I recommend picking it up if you get the chance.

==

Hunt the Space-Witch!: Seven Adventures in Time and SpaceHunt the Space-Witch!: Seven Adventures in Time and Space by Robert Silverberg

My rating: 2 of 5 stars

It was a little different from what I usually read. I’m not used to the magazine pulp style of Sci-fi stories in the book (as a child of the nineties I’m used to a full length novel). They were interesting tales of adventure and I’d definitively read more from the author if I could find a collection of his stories that were a little more interlinked than the seven in the book.
==

It was interesting. I liked the stories that were a little more developed (such as the story that gives this collection it’s name) over the stories that didn’t get a lot of development (like the very first one in the book). I gave it 2 stars because I didn’t hate it, but I also didn’t really like large parts of it.

==

Here Be Demons (Demons, #1)Here Be Demons by Esther M. Friesner

My rating: 1 of 5 stars

I may be being more harsh on this book than I should be, but I didn’t like this one at all. The point of view shifted without warning, the descriptions got really obtuse in places, I wasn’t able to figure out if the plot was trying to be funny or serious or ironically serious or if it just didn’t care. I would not recommend this one.

==

This book was slow, none of the characters were likable, and I’m not ashamed to say that I didn’t finish it. I know that it’s sort of a sin to review a book you didn’t complete, but nothing in the first hundred pages led me to believe that the last hundred or so were going to be any better. I’m glad that I only spent $1 on this at half priced books.

==

The Library of ShadowsThe Library of Shadows by Mikkel Birkegaard

My rating: 2 of 5 stars

This book had an interesting premise, and it was executed well enough, but it didn’t really grab me. It’s a decent enough urban fantasy, with secret societies and magic book reading powers and it has an interesting gimmick that I’ll most likely use in a future game, but for some reason I can’t bring myself to say that it was more than just ok. The characters were well written but the pacing felt slow in more than a few places and the book was a touch on the verbose side. I could go into more detail, but I don’t want to spoil it other to say that, due to the premise of the novel, the resolution was sort of corny in my opinion.
==

Spoiler alert: The book is about people who read so awesomely they get super powers from it. Not cool super powers, like in Inkheart, but lame super powers, like “really making someone enjoy hearing you read a book” super powers. For what it was (the classic dismissal) it was alright. I didn’t hate it and the characters were written well, but the premise did not light my fire.